|
Which of these three acoustic amps..
Question: Would be best for playing at home to playing mic'd in a gymnasium. Fender acoustasonics Answer: I've thought about getting the Junior model for awhile. I haven't tried the other two though Answer: How come its called a junior when it has 40 watts and the other one (one to the right) has thirty? Answer: Originally Posted by mmmthasgood1 How come its called a junior when it has 40 watts and the other one (one to the right) has thirty? because it's smaller than the SFX. Answer: Im talkin the one in the middle. the 30 DSP oh.. nevermind Answer: Originally Posted by mmmthasgood1 Im talkin the one in the middle. the 30 DSP oh.. nevermind right...the 30 is called the 30, the 40 is the Jr and the 80 is the SFX. Answer: for some reason i thought that the 30 DSP was compared to the junior, and the junior is bigger than the 30. That didnt make much sennse Answer: I've used the Acoustasonic Jr miked to the PA to play wedding receptions with pretty good results. If you're going to mike your amp, any of the models should be fine. For venues like small rooms, I've plugged my Martin into a Roland Microcube on "acoustic" setting -- sounds surprisingly good. Answer: If you're playing miked, then surely there is a FOH mixer. As a suggestion, buy a really good DI box and leave the amplification to the FOH. You can get some with parametric eq now which are immense as they allow the highest level of adjustment for your tone. Something like a LR Baggs Para Di or look into the new DTAR range. There have been some glowing reports of the Equinox. Then, ask for a wedge or two. Sorted. More money for you to spend on other things! Answer: k thanks Copyright © 2007 - 2008 www.thanktoday.com
|
|